Cadres Decide Everything: Reform of Cadre System in China in late 1980s – early 1990s

Authors

  • Ivan Yu. ZUENKO Moscow State University of International Relations (MGIMO)
  • Dmitry G. SELTSER Derzhavin Tambov State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24866/2542-1611/2022-1/58-69

Keywords:

China, cadre system, reform, perestroika, civil service, partocracy

Abstract

The article is dedicated to the analysis of the cadre system reform in China in late 1980s – early 1990s that was implemented as a part of wider ‘reforms and opening up’ policy. The cadre system reform (first of all, Provisional Regulations on State Civil Servants, 1993) managed to improve recruiting, indoctrination and functions of Chinese bureaucracy. The reform brought start to the practices of enrolment exams, rotation of leadership and hierarchy system of administrative ranks. All these measures became one of key factors of maintaining and strengthening of China’s partocracy regime in 1990s, which contrasted with crisis in international communism movement and collapse of the Soviet Union and its Communist Party. The success of these measures conducted in the framework of the experimental reform led to adopting Civil Servants Law in 2005, which was fully based on previous Provisional Regulations on State Civil Servants.

Author Biographies

  • Ivan Yu. ZUENKO, Moscow State University of International Relations (MGIMO)

    Candidate of Historical Sciences, Senior Research Fellow, Institute of International Studies,
    Moscow State University of International Relations (MGIMO), Research Fellow, Institute of History, Archeology and
    Ethnology, Far Eastern branch of Russian Academy of Sciences

  • Dmitry G. SELTSER, Derzhavin Tambov State University

    Doctor of Political Sciences, Director, Center for Political Transformations Studies, Professor at
    the Department of International Studies and Political Science

Downloads

Published

25-03-2022

How to Cite

“Cadres Decide Everything: Reform of Cadre System in China in late 1980s – early 1990s” (2022) Oriental Institute Journal, (1), pp. 58–69. doi:10.24866/2542-1611/2022-1/58-69.