Review

1. Manuscripts received by the editors are reviewed for compliance with the journal's subject matter and the formatting rules established in the journal. Manuscripts are subject to a mandatory check for borrowing and re-publication.

2. Manuscripts that correspond to the subject of the journal and the rules of registration, by decision of the editors, are submitted for review.

3. The reviewers selected by the editorial board must have a scientific degree, be recognized experts in the relevant field, and also have publications on the subject of the reviewed article within the last three years.

4. Peer review is anonymous, both for the author of the manuscript and for the reviewer.

5. When preparing the text of the review, the reviewer must be guided by the requirements for the content and design of reviews and scientific reports, approved by the editors of the journal.

6. The reviewer is obliged to submit a signed and certified at the place of work review to the editors of the journal no later than two weeks after receiving the manuscript of the article.

7. Reviews are stored in the archive of the editorial office of the journal for 5 years.

8. Upon receipt of the review, its content is considered by the executive editor and one of the members of the editorial board within a week. If the executive editor or a member of the editorial board disagrees with the reviewer's resolution on the manuscript, it is sent for additional review. The result of the additional review is approved by the responsible editor as final.

9. The editorial board of the journal sends copies of reviews or a reasoned refusal to the authors of submitted manuscripts, and also undertakes to send copies of reviews to the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation upon receipt of a corresponding request by the editorial office of the journal.

10. In case of a positive review result and no comments, the text of the manuscript is submitted to the technical editor for inclusion in the layout of the next issue of the journal.

11. If the reviewer has comments, the editors notify the author of their content with a proposal to make the necessary corrections and additions to the text of the manuscript. After the author makes corrections and additions, the text of the manuscript is submitted for publication.

12. In case of a negative result of the review, the author is sent a notice about the impossibility of publishing the article along with a copy of the review received on it.

13. The editors do not enter into discussions with the authors of the manuscripts regarding the decisions of the reviewers.

Approximate content and design of the review