Institute of project office in organizations with bimodal management

Authors

  • Olga Bobrova Ural Institute of Management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
  • Igor Chelak Ural Institute of Management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
  • Leonid Kirillov Ural Institute of Management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24866/2311-2271/2024-2/920

Keywords:

project, bimodal management, project management, strategic management, project office, national project, partnership

Abstract

Today a lot of attention is paid to project management. This is due both to the special importance of supporting strategic advantage (rapid changes, an objective reduction in the life cycle of modern products and an increase in dependence on customer needs can critically devalue the assets and potential of the organization), and to the need to find solutions to problems without disrupting the overall functioning and taking into account the risks associated with resistance to change. In management practice, projects are often equated with programs and interpreted as a set of pre-planned activities, which requires maintaining the "top" management, providing resources for the implementation of these activities. Meanwhile, the key in projects is budgeting tasks, results of operations, and not activities, individual operations. At the same time, within the framework of the tasks set, the set of their constituent operations should not be administered. If this condition is not met, then there will be no positive effects of the project associated with novelty (discoveries), changes, development. Another innovation of the 21st century for managing the development of organized systems is bimodal management. This article discusses the features of project management in private and public organizations when they use modern bimodal management, as well as the problems of functioning of a special project support structure — the project office. The author's approach to projects as a partnership is proposed, in contrast to a special organization of resource management and operations with a bias towards coordination and control activities, in principle alien to the idea of projects as activities of personally interested persons outside the framework of official or functional duties and powers. The article shows the restrictive conditions of the project method and proposals for overcoming them in the field of public administration.

Author Biographies

  • Olga Bobrova, Ural Institute of Management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

    PhD in Sociology, Associate Professor, Department of Personnel Management and Sociology, Acting Dean of the Faculty of State and Municipal Management

  • Igor Chelak, Ural Institute of Management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

    PhD in Economics, Deputy Dean of the Faculty of State and Municipal Management

  • Leonid Kirillov, Ural Institute of Management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

    Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Regional and Municipal Management

References

Богданов В. Управление проектами. Корпоративная система — шаг за шагом. — М.: Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2016. — 240 с.

Грачева А.Д. Проектный офис как инновационная инфраструктура управления инновационными проектами // Вестник науки и образования. 2020. № 4–1 (82). С. 26–34.

Долженко Р.А. Возможности каскадирования целей организации среди участников Agile-проектов // Инновации. 2018. № 1 (231). С. 101–109.

Костенко Е.П. Современные тренды в управлении персоналом: отечественный и зарубежный опыт // Journal of Economic Regulation (Вопросы регулирования экономики). 2018. № 9 (4). С. 107–123.

Кириллов Л.Г. Бимодальное управление и принятие государственных управленческих решений // Вопросы управления. 2016. № 6 (43). С. 7–12.

Кириллов Л.Г., Емельянова Т.Э. Конструируем управление. — Челябинск: ПО “Книга”, 2004. — 248 с.

Попов Е.В., Веретенникова А.Ю., Омонов Ж.К. Эволюционный контур развития социальных инноваций // Инновации. 2017. № 8 (226). С. 25–32.

Ciasullo M.V., Troisi O., Grimaldi M. [et al.]. Multi-level governance for sustainable innovation in smart communities: an ecosystems approach // International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. 2020. Vol. 16. Р. 1167–1195.

Crozier M. On ne change pas la societe par decret // Futurible, Paris. 1979. № 25.

Darling Eric John, Whitty Stephen Jonathan. The project management office: it's just not what it used to be. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business // Emerald Publishing. 2016. Vol. 9 (2). Р. 282–308.

Noori Nazir Ahmad, Dr. Cihan Tinaztepe. Аn exploratory research on holacracy: a new governance process for the organizations // Pearson Journal of Social Sciences – Humanities. 2022. Vol. 7. Issue 17. Р. 101–119.

North D.C. Institutions and Productivity in History // Economics Working Paper Archive at WUSTL. 1994. — URL: http://ecsocman.hse.ru/text/16180524/.

Silviusa Gilbert. The role of the Project Management Office in Sustainable Project Management // Procedia Computer Science. 2021. Vol. 181 (6). Р. 1066–1076.

Williamson O.E. The economic institutions of capitalism: firms, markets, relational contracting. — New York: The Free Press, 1985. — 450 p.

Downloads

Published

16-08-2024

How to Cite

Institute of project office in organizations with bimodal management. (2024). Bulletin of the Far Eastern Federal University. Economics and Management, 2, 62-75. https://doi.org/10.24866/2311-2271/2024-2/920