ASEAN Participation in Resolving Disputes in the South China Sea

Authors

  • Leang Thangsoth Saint Petersburg State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24866/1813-3274/2024-2/128-135

Keywords:

ASEAN, China, South China Sea, international politics, international law, territorial disputes, regional stability

Abstract

This article examines China's past approach to resolving its claims, noting that when resolving a territorial dispute, a state may pursue any of these three general strategies: cooperation, escalation, or delay. As part of a cooperative strategy, a state may offer to either cede control of disputed territory or renounce its claims to that territory without threats or use of force. In an escalation strategy, a state may resort to coercive diplomacy to achieve a favorable outcome at the negotiating table or use threats or force to gain control of disputed territory. In the delay strategy, on the other hand, the state can assert its claims in the dispute, without offering concessions or using force. A delaying strategy allows the applicant state to gain time to strengthen its position and achieve a more desirable result. This strategy also allows a state to strengthen its claims and control over disputed territory either through diplomatic means or through military actors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Leang Thangsoth, Saint Petersburg State University

    Postgraduate Student at the Department of International Relations and World Politics 

Downloads

Published

27-08-2024

How to Cite

Leang, T. (2024). ASEAN Participation in Resolving Disputes in the South China Sea. PACIFIC RIM: Economics, Politics, Law, 26(2), 128-135. https://doi.org/10.24866/1813-3274/2024-2/128-135